With the following slides and interactive material you will be able to take part in the journey to discover Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) its components and benefits through the observation of multiple examples and exercises.
You can navigate through the course by pressing the navigation arrows at the bottom of each slide or using your arrow keys on your keyboard. You can move horizontally (← →) for viewing each theme and vertically (↑↓) to view extra recommended information
EUROSION
|
|
“To provide the European Commission with a package of recommendations on policy and management measures to address coastal erosion in the EU. These recommendations should be based on a thorough assessment of the state of coastline and of the response options available at each level of administration.”
Example of Ajaccio Bay |
Geological data at scale 1:50,000
(source: BRGM, France)
Need to identify the gaps and make priorities to bridge them
Need to define a common terrestrial reference system for data production and processing
Need to build pan-european “seamless” data with standard specifications
Sources 1:
Coastline : SABE (EuroGeographics)
Bathymetry : TCIFMS (SHOM)
Topography : BDTOPO (IGN)
Sources 2:
Coastline : SABE (EuroGeographics)
Bathymetry : GEBCO (BODC)
Topography : MONA PRO
Need to adopt a common level of perception and representation of data
CORINE Land Cover 1990
SABE Coastline
0 m < Difference < 50 m
50 m < Difference < 200 m
Difference > 200 m
EUROSION database = 2 Millions Euros
The absence of a European spatial data infrastructure results in:
There is a need for developing an infrastructure that provides direct access to harmonized (interoperable) data and that can be shared amongst all those that need it
Many attempts to define and conceptualize SDI
Focus on the components (spatial data, technology, policies, standards and people)
Recognizing its dynamic nature (evolution)
Identifying (data) sharing as a key issue
Describing different views of SDI hierarchy
|
Laws or voluntary agreements governing the collaboration between producers and/or users of geodata. An organizational structure; mandates; who does what? - Mechanisms for financing the SDI and its coordination |
Laws/agreements about pricing and licensing of geodatasets: |
Laws/agreements about how to deal with: | |
---|---|---|
|
|
Required in almost every application as the geometric foundation
Useful for several thematic domains
Application schema (defines the model) | |
Data harmonization
|
It is about more than the dataset alone
This is reflected in the geospatial standards! |
Note: source material (data) from which the image is generated does not need to be an image, but can be a Shapefile, PostGIS database, Oracle Spatial,…
|
Service chaining: different services combined to produce the output
Publish – Find – Agree - Bind
The ‘agree’ part: rights management services
Related to the Institutional and organizational aspects of SDI |
Different technical services and components are distributed over the net.
Talk to each other through APIs
If standardised, components from different software providers can talk to each other
Standards are needed!
Standards are everywhere
Standards are...
“Documented agreements containing technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used consistently as rules, guidelines, or definitions of characteristics, to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose”
(ISO, 2019)
|
|
“The interesting thing about Standards is that there are so many to chose from…” |
Many standardization bodies exist
38 Participating Members, 31 Observing Members
Not-for-profit, international voluntary consensus standards organization; leading development of geospatial standards |
|
|
A document, established by consensus and approved by the OGC Membership, that provides rules and guidelines, aimed at the optimum degree of interoperability in a given context.
|
Different types of standards: technical and semantic
In summary:
technical standards will make you connected, while semantic standards will make you understood (Reuvers, 2005)
Different types of standards: de facto and de juro:
Sometimes a de facto standard is formally adopted (e.g. KML)
Standards for
|
Standards for data (semantic!)
More than exchange formats. Specify what must be included in datasets and how it must be stored
Focus on standardised conceptual/logical data models and data specifications (UML)
Standards and specifications related to geographical objects
Standards for services (How it works: technical!)
OGC standards (often also covered by ISO) for use with all kinds of client-server combinations
Similar to the services available in an SDI!
Define information about data or services, needed to search, explore, assess, connect to available resources
|
Metadata are everywhere Metadata can be found on all consumer products in our food chain (check a coca cola can) or any other product for that matter. It gives you information on who produced/delivered the product and how you can contact them, a description of the product, it provides a (bar-)code with unique identifier, a ‘preview’ of the product, information on how to use the product (or not), the ingredients, information about the quality, the validity date (the date it was produced and the date until you can consume it), the size/volume, etc. |
Inform the user about
|
Different communities,other standards The Dublin Core standard is used for documenting reports, archiving files, etc. It consist of several elements to understand the document / file:
|
Where storing metadata? |
A catalogue allows you to group the metadata records together and to expose the information via the web through a ‘discovery’ or catalogue service. The latter allows to have all information on datasets (and services) of the SDI in one place. |
Different types for different purposes |
It is recommended to start with the mandatory metadata elements which are required for discovery purposes and which are ‘easy’ to maintain: e.g. title, abstract, reference date, language, topic category. Usually metadata elements are grouped.
Some optional elements are also recommended: e.g. responsibility party, lineage, online resource.
The table shows the so-called core elements of the ISO 19115:2003 standard.
Schema consists of metadata elements.
|
The core metadata elements answering the following questions: |
Identification information contains information to uniquely identify the data. Identification information includes information about the citation for the resource (title), an abstract, an identifier, keyword(s), the purpose, credit, the status and points of contact. The MD_Identification entity is mandatory. It contains mandatory, conditional, and optional elements. |
Identification elements
Title - Should be self-explaining and not too long – don’t use the filename of the resource! Abstract - Should be concise and explain what the dataset is about, usually 1/3 to ½ page text Identifier - a unique code for the resource, not automatically generated but part of a PID strategy for information infrastructures Keyword(s) - the topic(s) covered by the dataset; might use an existing vocabulary (e.g. GEMET) Format - vector or raster data Type - it can be a dataset, a dataset series or a web service |
Coordinate Reference System is referring to the projects, the ellipsoid and datum of the dataset including a link to the CRS type (code list) and projection parameters. |
|
Data Quality contains a general assessment of the quality of the dataset. Data Quality is an aggregate of the Lineage and Data Quality Elements. The latter can include following elements: completeness, logical consistency, positional accuracy, thematic accuracy and temporal accuracy. Those five entities can be further subdivided to the sub-elements of data quality. |
Constraints can impose limitations of sharing and use. The reasons might be variable. Sensitive information such as personal or military information might need to be secured, or vulnerable species or habitats might be protected as well. On the other hand there might be legal constraints related to the existence of copyrights, patents or licenses (paying fees), or there might be some restrictions on what users can do with the data. |
Geoportals as one of the possible applications to connect to the geographical (meta)data
Key component of a SDI |
Some definitions and characteristics:
“A geoportal may be defined as an internet or intranet entry point with the tools for retrieving metadata, searching for GI, visualizing GI, downloading GI, disseminating GI and in some cases the ordering of GI services”
(Giff et al., 2008)